Humor & Quirks
Sun, August 3, 2025
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Rock Paper Shotgun
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: National Geographic news
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The New Republic
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: on3.com
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: BuzzFeed
Sat, August 2, 2025
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Parade Pets
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Sporting News
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Columbian
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Forbes
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: WGME
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Raw Story
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: WSL Full-Time
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: BuzzFeed
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: House Digest
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: MLB
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Gold Derby
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Los Angeles Daily News
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: YourTango
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Heavy.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Dispatch
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Seattle Times
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Rolling Stone
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: PC World
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: New York Post
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Journal Star
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Sporting News
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: WMBD Peoria
Thu, July 31, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: yahoo.com
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: PureWow
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: fingerlakes1
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: the-sun.com
Wed, July 30, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: fingerlakes1
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Neowin
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: NME
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: PhoneArena
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Associated Press
Tue, July 29, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: WNYT NewsChannel 13
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: PC World
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: SlashGear
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Men's Journal
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: PhoneArena
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Rock Paper Shotgun
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Food Republic
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Irish Examiner
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: The Boston Globe
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: Talksport
[ Tue, Jul 29th ]: The Financial Express
Mon, July 28, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: The Inertia
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: PetHelpful
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: East Bay Times
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Newsweek
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: ESPN
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Real Simple
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: NPR
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Sun Sentinel
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: SheKnows
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Men's Journal
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Los Angeles Daily News
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Yahoo Sports
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Roll Tide Wire
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Cleveland.com
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: TSN
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Dallas Morning News
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: NBC Chicago
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: nbcnews.com
Sun, July 27, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Southern Living
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: TechSpot
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Le Monde.fr
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: TechRadar
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Rolling Stone
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Daily Mail
Sat, July 26, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: Vogue
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: fox6now
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: BuzzFeed
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: YourTango
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: on3.com
Fri, July 25, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Fox 11 News
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: USA TODAY
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Baltimore Sun
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Seattle Times
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: SPIN
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Yen.com.gh
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Newsweek
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: breitbart.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Mashable
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Indianapolis Star
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: DC News Now Washington
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WWLP Springfield
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Frederick News-Post, Md.
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: MassLive
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: KTVI
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WJTV Jackson
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WGAL
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Texas Tribune
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WSYR Syracuse
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WESH
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WSMV
Thu, July 24, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Toronto Star
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Daily Meal
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Daily Dot
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: YourTango
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: KTVU
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: News 8000
Wed, July 23, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Orange County Register
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: CNN
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Sun
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: MassLive
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ClutchPoints
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Billboard
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Mashable
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Wrap
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Brides
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Athlon Sports
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Newsweek
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Columbian
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Parade
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: KHON Honolulu
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Telegraph
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Reuters
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Total Pro Sports
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WSB-TV
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: NewsNation
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Fox News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WGME
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WDAF
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WTTG
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Onlymyhealth
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Grand Forks Herald
Tue, July 22, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WJAX
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Courier-Journal
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Post-Bulletin, Rochester, Minn.
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WAVY
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: E! News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: yahoo.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Los Angeles Times
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: gizmodo.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WVLA Baton Rouge
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WSB-TV
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WKBN Youngstown
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Telegram
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Telegraph
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: lbbonline
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: CBS News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: KHQ
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Fox Business
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WIVB
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WLWT
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Lodi News-Sentinel, Calif.
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Democrat and Chronicle
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: HuffPost
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Chowhound
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Vulture
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Sun
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: AZ Central
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Daily Express
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Independent
Mon, July 21, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: the-sun.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Daily Mail
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Parade Pets
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: CBSSports.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: gizmodo.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: The Mirror
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Daily Express
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: OK! Magazine UK
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Cowboys Wire
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: The Indianapolis Star
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: newsbytesapp.com
Inside the life of an extra, and how they might all get killed off by AI
//humor-quirks.news-articles.net/content/2025/07 .. and-how-they-might-all-get-killed-off-by-ai.html
Published in Humor and Quirks on Tuesday, July 22nd 2025 at 1:43 GMT by The Independent🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
As the BBC comedy ''Extras'' turns 20, Nick Hilton looks at the quirks of a job that has been integral to the TV and film industry, and the threat it''s faced with today
The End of the Extra? How AI is Poised to Revolutionize – or Devastate – Background Acting in TV and Film
In the bustling world of Hollywood and beyond, where the spotlight shines brightest on A-list stars, an often-overlooked army of performers has long formed the backbone of cinematic realism: the extras. These background actors, sometimes called "atmosphere" or "supporting artists," populate the scenes that make movies and TV shows feel alive – the bustling crowds in a city street, the diners in a restaurant, the soldiers in a battlefield epic. For decades, they've been the unsung heroes, enduring long hours, unpredictable schedules, and modest pay for the chance to be part of the magic. But now, a technological tidal wave is crashing onto their shores: artificial intelligence. AI-generated digital extras are emerging as a cost-effective alternative, threatening to render human background actors obsolete. This shift, accelerated by recent advancements in generative AI, raises profound questions about the future of work in entertainment, the ethics of digital replication, and the very soul of storytelling on screen.
To understand the gravity of this change, consider the traditional role of extras. In films like *Titanic* or *The Lord of the Rings*, thousands of extras were employed to create immersive worlds. Peter Jackson's Middle-earth epics, for instance, relied on hordes of real people dressed as orcs and elves, their movements choreographed to perfection. Extras aren't just filler; they add authenticity, reacting organically to the action around them. Veteran extra Sarah Thompson, who has appeared in over 50 productions, including BBC dramas and Hollywood blockbusters, describes the job as a blend of endurance and artistry. "You're not just standing there," she says. "You're inhabiting a character, even if it's silent. You react to the leads, you improvise subtle gestures – it's what makes a scene breathe." For many, it's a gateway into the industry, a way to network, learn, and occasionally snag speaking roles. But the pay is often meager – in the UK, a standard day rate might hover around £100-£150, while in the US, SAG-AFTRA minimums start at about $187 for an eight-hour day. It's a gig economy within the gig economy, with no guarantees of steady work.
Enter AI, the disruptor that's already making waves. Companies like Wonder Dynamics and Runway ML are developing tools that allow filmmakers to generate hyper-realistic digital humans with a few clicks. These AI extras can be customized for appearance, clothing, and behavior, then seamlessly integrated into footage. Disney's *The Mandalorian* pioneered related technology with its "Volume" LED stage, but the real game-changer is generative AI, which can create entirely synthetic crowds. Take the 2023 film *The Creator*, a sci-fi thriller that used AI to populate dystopian landscapes with digital figures, reducing the need for large-scale casting calls. Similarly, Amazon's *The Rings of Power* employed AI enhancements for battle scenes, blending real actors with virtual ones. Proponents argue this isn't just about savings – though costs are a big factor. Hiring, transporting, feeding, and managing hundreds of extras can balloon budgets into the millions. AI eliminates those logistics, allowing for infinite reshoots without overtime pay or union negotiations.
The financial allure is undeniable. A report from the World Economic Forum estimates that AI could automate up to 300,000 jobs in the creative industries by 2030, with background acting particularly vulnerable. Studios like Warner Bros. and Netflix are investing heavily in AI startups, seeing it as a way to streamline production in an era of skyrocketing costs. "AI lets us focus resources on the storytellers who matter most – the writers, directors, and stars," says tech consultant Mark Reilly, who advises on digital production. "Background elements are just that: background. Why pay for humans when pixels can do it cheaper and faster?" This perspective echoes the broader tech-driven efficiency that's transformed industries from manufacturing to journalism. In film, AI can even "age" or diversify crowds post-production, fixing inclusivity issues without recasting.
Yet, for the humans caught in the crosshairs, this innovation feels like an existential threat. The 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, which paralyzed Hollywood for months, highlighted these fears. Actors demanded protections against AI replicating their likenesses without consent or compensation. The union secured some wins, including requirements for "informed consent" and residuals for AI-generated performances based on scanned actors. But extras, often non-union or on the fringes, worry these safeguards won't extend to them. "We're the low-hanging fruit," laments Thompson. "AI can scan a face once and reuse it forever. What happens to the day players like me?" Stories abound of extras being scanned during auditions, their digital doubles potentially populating future projects without further pay. In the UK, Equity, the performers' union, has launched campaigns warning of "digital slavery," where actors' images are exploited indefinitely.
Beyond economics, there's a cultural dimension. Human extras bring unpredictability and humanity to sets. Director James Cameron, known for his tech-forward films, has spoken about the "energy" real crowds provide, something AI might struggle to replicate authentically. "AI extras don't sneeze, they don't laugh off-script, they don't add that spark of life," argues film historian Elena Vasquez. "Cinema is about capturing human imperfection. If everything becomes too perfect, too controlled, we lose the essence." This debate mirrors earlier disruptions, like the shift from practical effects to CGI in the 1990s, which displaced many stunt performers and model makers. But AI feels different – it's not just replacing tools; it's replacing people.
Personal anecdotes underscore the human cost. Take Miguel Rivera, a Los Angeles-based extra who's supported his family through background work in shows like *Stranger Things* and *The Crown*. At 45, with a resume spanning two decades, he recalls the camaraderie on set: "You're part of a temporary family. AI can't replace that bond." Rivera was recently scanned for a Marvel project, signing away rights to his likeness for a one-time fee. "They said it was for 'reference,' but who knows? Next year, I might see myself in a crowd scene without getting paid." Such experiences fuel anxiety, especially among underrepresented groups. Women, people of color, and older actors often rely on extra work as an entry point, and AI could exacerbate inequalities if algorithms favor certain "types" based on biased data sets.
Industry insiders predict a hybrid future. Some productions might use AI for hazardous or large-scale scenes – think exploding battlefields where real extras would be at risk – while reserving humans for intimate settings. Tools like Deep Voodoo, founded by *South Park* creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, allow for ethical AI use, with actors opting in and sharing profits. But skeptics warn of a slippery slope. "Once AI becomes normalized for backgrounds, it'll creep into foreground roles," says labor economist Dr. Lila Chen. "Voice acting is already under siege from AI dubbing; visuals are next."
As AI evolves, so too must regulations. The European Union is drafting AI laws that could mandate transparency in digital creations, potentially influencing global standards. In the US, bills like the No Fakes Act aim to protect against unauthorized deepfakes. For now, though, the extras' world hangs in limbo. Thompson, ever the optimist, hopes for adaptation: "Maybe AI will create new jobs – like training models or curating digital performances. But we need to fight for our place." Rivera agrees, urging young aspirants to unionize and advocate.
Ultimately, the rise of AI extras challenges us to redefine authenticity in entertainment. Will films become soulless simulations, or will technology enhance human creativity? As screens fill with pixel-perfect crowds, the real drama unfolds off-camera, where thousands of background actors battle for survival in an industry that's always been about illusion. The question isn't just whether AI will replace extras, but what we'll lose if it does – the raw, unscripted humanity that makes stories resonate. In this brave new world, the background might fade to black, but the fight for the foreground is just beginning. (928 words)
Read the Full The Independent Article at:
[ https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/features/extras-tv-film-ai-background-actors-b2792973.html ]