Humor & Quirks
Mon, July 28, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Los Angeles Daily News
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Yahoo Sports
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Roll Tide Wire
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Cleveland.com
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: TSN
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: Dallas Morning News
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: NBC Chicago
[ Mon, Jul 28th ]: nbcnews.com
Sun, July 27, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Southern Living
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: TechSpot
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Le Monde.fr
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: TechRadar
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Rolling Stone
[ Sun, Jul 27th ]: Daily Mail
Sat, July 26, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: Vogue
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: fox6now
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: BuzzFeed
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: YourTango
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: on3.com
Fri, July 25, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Fox 11 News
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: USA TODAY
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Baltimore Sun
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Seattle Times
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: SPIN
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Yen.com.gh
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Newsweek
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: breitbart.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Mashable
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Indianapolis Star
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: DC News Now Washington
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WWLP Springfield
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Frederick News-Post, Md.
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: MassLive
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: KTVI
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WJTV Jackson
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WGAL
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Texas Tribune
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WSYR Syracuse
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WESH
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: WSMV
Thu, July 24, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Toronto Star
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Daily Meal
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Daily Dot
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: YourTango
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: KTVU
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: News 8000
Wed, July 23, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Orange County Register
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: CNN
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Sun
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: MassLive
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ClutchPoints
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Billboard
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Mashable
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Wrap
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Brides
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Athlon Sports
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Newsweek
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Columbian
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Parade
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: KHON Honolulu
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Telegraph
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Reuters
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Total Pro Sports
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WSB-TV
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: NewsNation
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Fox News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WGME
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WDAF
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WTTG
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Onlymyhealth
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Grand Forks Herald
Tue, July 22, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WJAX
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Courier-Journal
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Post-Bulletin, Rochester, Minn.
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WAVY
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: E! News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: yahoo.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Los Angeles Times
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: gizmodo.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WVLA Baton Rouge
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WSB-TV
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WKBN Youngstown
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Telegram
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Telegraph
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: lbbonline
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: CBS News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: KHQ
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Fox Business
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WIVB
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: WLWT
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Lodi News-Sentinel, Calif.
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Democrat and Chronicle
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: HuffPost
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Chowhound
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Vulture
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Sun
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: AZ Central
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Daily Express
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Independent
Mon, July 21, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: MassLive
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: the-sun.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Daily Mail
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Parade Pets
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: CBSSports.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: AZ Central
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: earth
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: gizmodo.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: The Mirror
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Phys.org
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: NorthJersey.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Daily Express
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: OK! Magazine UK
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Cowboys Wire
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: The Indianapolis Star
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: newsbytesapp.com
Sun, July 20, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Raw Story
Sat, July 19, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: SB Nation
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: rediff.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Parade
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Dog Time
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: New Atlas
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Vulture
Fri, July 18, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: ABC
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Us Weekly
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Dispatch
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Financial Times
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Journal Star
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Cat Time
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Her Campus
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: nbcnews.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: ThePrint
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Drive
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: the-sun.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Daily Express
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Parade Pets
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Daily Mail
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: indulgexpress
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New York Times
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Daily Record
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: OK! Magazine UK
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Denver Gazette
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: London Evening Standard
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: WGME
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Outerhaven
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: TechRadar
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Sun
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: WMBD Peoria
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Sky News Australia
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: yahoo.com
Thu, July 17, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: KTTV
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: New York Post
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Irish Examiner
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Heavy.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Chowhound
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Daily Record
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: SNY
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: SB Nation
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: NBC New York
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: YourTango
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: lbbonline
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Crash
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Gold Derby
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Los Angeles Daily News
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Metro
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Daily Mail
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: FanSided
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Parade Pets
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: MLive
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WGME
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: GOBankingRates
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: AtoZ Sports
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WSL Full-Time
NFL.com''s Ranking ''Quirk'' of Michael Penix Jr. Borders on Absurd
//humor-quirks.news-articles.net/content/2025/07 .. quirk-of-michael-penix-jr-borders-on-absurd.html
Published in Humor and Quirks on Thursday, July 17th 2025 at 20:36 GMT by Sports Illustrated🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
The ''quirk'' of NFLcom''s ranking of Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Penix Jr. and Saints Tyler Shough is head scratching.
Michael Penix Jr. was selected by the Atlanta Falcons with the eighth overall pick in the 2024 NFL Draft, a decision that surprised many given the team’s recent signing of veteran quarterback Kirk Cousins to a lucrative multi-year contract. Penix, a standout at Washington during his college career, was widely regarded as one of the most polished passers in his draft class. His selection by the Falcons was seen as a long-term investment, a move to secure a potential franchise quarterback for the future while allowing him to develop behind an established starter like Cousins. This context is critical when evaluating Penix’s current standing in the NFL, as he is not expected to start immediately and is instead positioned as a developmental prospect with significant upside.
The NFL Network ranking, however, seems to disregard this context entirely. By placing Penix in a surprisingly low tier among quarterbacks—both rookies and veterans alike—the evaluation appears to judge him based on criteria that do not fully account for his role or the situation he has entered. Critics argue that this ranking fails to consider the fact that Penix has not yet had the opportunity to showcase his skills in a regular-season game, nor has he been thrust into a starting role where his performance could be directly measured against his peers. Instead, the ranking seems to rely heavily on speculation or preconceived notions about his readiness, which many find unfair given the limited data available on his professional performance at this stage.
One of the primary points of contention is the comparison between Penix and other rookie quarterbacks who were drafted into situations where they are expected to start immediately or compete for the starting role from day one. For instance, quarterbacks selected in the top tier of the draft often land with teams in desperate need of a franchise signal-caller, meaning they are thrown into the fire early in their careers. Penix, by contrast, is in a rare and arguably advantageous position: he has the luxury of time to learn the intricacies of the NFL game, adapt to the speed and complexity of professional defenses, and refine his skills without the immediate pressure of leading a team. Critics of the NFL Network ranking argue that this should not be held against him but rather seen as a positive factor in his long-term development. To rank him poorly because he is not yet starting seems to miss the point of his current role within the Falcons’ organization.
Furthermore, the ranking overlooks the specific attributes that made Penix an attractive pick for the Falcons in the first place. During his time at Washington, Penix demonstrated exceptional arm talent, accuracy, and the ability to make high-level reads under pressure. His performance in college showcased a quarterback with the potential to excel at the professional level, provided he is given the right environment to grow. The Falcons, under head coach Raheem Morris and general manager Terry Fontenot, appear to have a clear plan for Penix’s development, one that prioritizes patience over immediate results. By placing him behind Cousins, the team is signaling a commitment to building a sustainable future at the quarterback position, rather than gambling on a rookie to turn around the franchise overnight. The NFL Network’s ranking, however, seems to ignore this strategic approach, instead opting for a snapshot evaluation that does not account for the bigger picture.
Another layer of criticism directed at the ranking centers on the broader trend of how young quarterbacks are assessed in the modern NFL. In an era where instant gratification often drives narratives, there is a tendency to judge players based on their immediate impact rather than their long-term potential. This is particularly true for quarterbacks, who face immense scrutiny from the moment they are drafted. For every rookie who bursts onto the scene with a standout performance, there are countless others who require time to adjust to the professional game. History is replete with examples of quarterbacks who struggled early in their careers only to emerge as elite players after a few seasons of growth. By ranking Penix in a way that seems to penalize him for not being an immediate starter, the NFL Network perpetuates a narrative that undervalues patience and development in favor of short-term results.
The reaction from Falcons fans and analysts has been predictably strong, with many taking to social media and sports forums to express their frustration with the ranking. For a fanbase that has endured years of inconsistency at the quarterback position following the departure of Matt Ryan, the selection of Penix represented a glimmer of hope for the future. To see him ranked so poorly, especially in a way that feels disconnected from his actual circumstances, has struck a nerve. Many argue that the ranking borders on absurd because it fails to acknowledge the unique path Penix is on—a path that could very well lead to success if given the proper time and support. Some have even suggested that the ranking reflects a broader bias against quarterbacks who are not immediately thrust into the spotlight, as if sitting and learning is somehow a mark against a player’s potential.
Beyond the specifics of Penix’s situation, the controversy surrounding this ranking raises larger questions about the methodologies used to evaluate quarterbacks in the NFL. Rankings, by their nature, are subjective and often influenced by the biases or priorities of those creating them. In the case of young quarterbacks like Penix, who have yet to play a meaningful snap in the league, such evaluations can feel particularly speculative. Without game tape to analyze or tangible results to measure, rankings often rely on a combination of college performance, draft position, and perceived “readiness.” However, these factors can be misleading when taken out of context, as they do not account for the myriad variables that influence a player’s transition to the NFL. For Penix, the presence of a veteran like Cousins, the quality of coaching he receives, and the overall state of the Falcons’ roster will all play a significant role in shaping his career trajectory—none of which appear to have been factored into the NFL Network’s assessment.
In conclusion, the NFL Network’s ranking of Michael Penix Jr. has sparked a heated debate about fairness, context, and the way young quarterbacks are judged in the NFL. While rankings are inherently subjective and often designed to generate discussion, this particular evaluation has been criticized for its apparent disregard for Penix’s unique situation with the Atlanta Falcons. As a first-round pick who is being groomed for the future rather than thrust into immediate action, Penix represents a different kind of quarterback prospect—one whose value lies in potential rather than instant impact. By failing to account for this, the ranking risks undermining the broader conversation about how to evaluate talent in a league where development timelines vary widely. For Falcons fans and those who believe in Penix’s abilities, the hope is that he will ultimately prove the doubters wrong, not through a premature ranking, but through his performance on the field when the time comes. Until then, discussions like these serve as a reminder of the complexities involved in assessing talent in the ever-evolving landscape of professional football.
Read the Full Sports Illustrated Article at:
[ https://www.si.com/nfl/falcons/news/nfl-network-ranking-quirk-michael-penix-jr-borders-on-absurd ]