N🟁N

New England College professor born in Iran speaks on US airstrikes

The article from WMUR, published on April 19, 2024, discusses the perspectives of a New England College professor, Dr. Nader Entessar, on the recent airstrikes between Iran and the United States. The article provides a detailed analysis of the geopolitical tensions, the potential consequences of these military actions, and the broader implications for international relations and Middle Eastern politics.

Dr. Entessar, a professor of political science with a focus on Middle Eastern studies, offers his insights into the escalating conflict between Iran and the United States. The article begins by outlining the recent airstrikes, which have heightened tensions in the region. According to Dr. Entessar, these military actions are part of a long-standing pattern of hostility between the two nations, rooted in historical grievances and geopolitical rivalries.

The professor explains that the immediate trigger for the latest round of airstrikes was a series of provocations, including alleged attacks on American military bases in Iraq, which the U.S. attributed to Iranian-backed militias. In response, the U.S. conducted airstrikes targeting Iranian military facilities, leading to retaliatory strikes by Iran. Dr. Entessar emphasizes that these actions are not isolated incidents but part of a broader cycle of violence that has persisted for decades.

Dr. Entessar delves into the historical context of U.S.-Iran relations, highlighting key events such as the 1953 coup d'état, which overthrew the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, and the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which led to the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran. These events, according to the professor, have shaped the current dynamics between the two countries and continue to influence their interactions.

The article also explores the geopolitical implications of the airstrikes. Dr. Entessar argues that the military actions have the potential to destabilize the entire Middle East region. He points out that other countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Israel, have vested interests in the outcome of the U.S.-Iran conflict and may be drawn into the fray. The professor warns that a broader regional conflict could have devastating consequences, including increased refugee flows, economic instability, and heightened terrorism risks.

Furthermore, Dr. Entessar discusses the impact of the airstrikes on global oil markets. He notes that any disruption in the supply of oil from the Middle East could lead to significant price spikes, affecting economies worldwide. The professor emphasizes that the U.S. and Iran, as major oil producers, have a significant role in maintaining global energy stability, and their military actions could undermine this stability.

The article also touches on the domestic political ramifications of the airstrikes in both the U.S. and Iran. In the U.S., Dr. Entessar suggests that the airstrikes could be used by the current administration to bolster its image as tough on Iran, potentially influencing public opinion ahead of upcoming elections. In Iran, the professor argues that the government may use the airstrikes to rally domestic support and justify its military expenditures.

Dr. Entessar also addresses the role of international diplomacy in resolving the conflict. He expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of current diplomatic efforts, citing the breakdown of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) as a significant setback. The professor believes that a new diplomatic approach is needed, one that addresses the root causes of the conflict and involves all relevant stakeholders, including regional powers and international organizations.

The article further explores the human cost of the airstrikes. Dr. Entessar highlights the civilian casualties and the destruction of infrastructure that often accompany such military actions. He stresses the importance of considering the humanitarian impact of the conflict and calls for greater efforts to protect civilians and provide humanitarian assistance.

In addition, the professor discusses the role of media and public perception in shaping the narrative around the airstrikes. He notes that both the U.S. and Iranian governments have engaged in propaganda efforts to justify their actions and vilify the other side. Dr. Entessar urges the public to seek out diverse sources of information and critically evaluate the narratives presented by both governments.

The article also touches on the potential for escalation and the risk of a full-scale war between the U.S. and Iran. Dr. Entessar warns that the current trajectory of the conflict could lead to a dangerous escalation, with both sides feeling compelled to respond to each other's actions. He emphasizes the need for de-escalation measures and diplomatic initiatives to prevent a catastrophic outcome.

Finally, the article concludes with Dr. Entessar's recommendations for moving forward. He advocates for a multi-faceted approach that includes diplomatic engagement, economic incentives, and confidence-building measures. The professor believes that a comprehensive strategy is needed to address the complex issues at the heart of the U.S.-Iran conflict and to achieve a lasting peace in the region.

Overall, the article provides a comprehensive analysis of the recent airstrikes between Iran and the United States, drawing on the expertise of Dr. Nader Entessar. It covers the historical context, geopolitical implications, domestic political ramifications, and humanitarian impact of the conflict, offering a nuanced perspective on a complex and volatile situation. The article underscores the importance of understanding the broader dynamics at play and the need for a thoughtful and multi-faceted approach to resolving the conflict.

Read the Full WMUR Article at:
[ https://www.wmur.com/article/new-england-college-professor-iran-us-airstrikes/65142945 ]