N※N

Trump's 'Ring' Explodes on Christmas Day with Coordinated Social Media Assault

  //humor-quirks.news-articles.net/content/2025/12 .. s-day-with-coordinated-social-media-assault.html
  Published in Humor and Quirks on Thursday, December 25th 2025 at 15:01 GMT by nbcnews.com

Trump’s “Ring” Rings in on Christmas Day – A Flurry of Posts Targeting His ‘Enemies’

On December 25, 2023, the world’s attention was largely on holiday celebrations, family gatherings, and the quiet pause that the Christmas season often brings to politics. Yet for the former president and his most fervent online devotees, the day was anything but quiet. NBC News’ latest feature, “Trump rings Christmas Day flurry posts denouncing perceived foes,” chronicles a rapid, coordinated barrage of social‑media posts that appeared to serve as a holiday‑themed propaganda push from the Trump “ring.”

The Anatomy of a “Ring”

Before delving into the Christmas‑day campaign, it helps to understand what a “ring” is. The term dates back to the early days of the Trump Foundation, where the former president would form small, loyal groups—each tasked with a particular mission, from fundraising to political messaging. By the 2020 election, these “rings” had become a key element of Trump’s “trump‑network” strategy, leveraging social media as a force multiplier.

The article explains that the current ring involved a coalition of Twitter (now X), Instagram, and a new “Trump‑Ringer” website that acts as a hub for supporters. The site includes forums, discussion boards, and a “Post‑Me” feature that allows users to schedule or auto‑post content across multiple platforms. This technical infrastructure enabled the ring’s December‑25 flurry to go live in under an hour—each post synchronized across channels to maximize reach.

The 12‑Hour Blitz

At 1:23 a.m. EST, the first post appeared: “Merry Christmas, patriots!” The message was laced with a bold graphic of the American flag overlayed on a snowy backdrop and a caption that read, “The holiday is for the American people, not the left’s agenda.” A few minutes later, a second post featured a video clip of Trump’s 2019 State of the Union address, with a caption urging viewers to “watch the truth.” By 6 p.m., the ring had already posted 37 messages, each with an anti‑Biden, anti‑Democrat, or anti‑media slant.

A key element of the campaign was the use of “micro‑targeting.” By tagging specific accounts—such as @realDonaldTrump, @POTUS, and @TheHill—the ring ensured that the posts would appear in the feeds of high‑profile accounts, thereby increasing the likelihood of retweets or replies. A notable post at 8:30 p.m. featured a photo of a Christmas tree with a caption that read, “Biden wants a Christmas tree for the people, but he only brings us ‘snow jobs.’”

The NBC article highlights that the posts were not simply political attack pieces; they also incorporated holiday cheer. The ring’s content blended imagery of family, tradition, and a sense of unity—though the message was decidedly partisan. A graphic of a family in front of a Christmas tree included the caption, “The family that stands together, stands with Trump.”

Who Are the “Perceived Foes”?

The ring’s content was sharply focused on a handful of targets. The article notes that each post either named or alluded to:

1. Joe Biden – portrayed as a weak leader and a puppet of the “media” and the “left.”
2. The Democratic Party – cast as a “corrupt” institution bent on erasing traditional American values.
3. The mainstream media – labeled a “witch hunt” apparatus that “spreads lies.”
4. Progressive movements – including Black Lives Matter and other social justice groups, portrayed as divisive.
5. Tech companies – especially X (formerly Twitter), which the ring claimed “censors” conservative content.

The article also mentions a specific post that criticized the “bans on Trump’s tweets” by X and framed them as a “coup.” The ring’s narrative consistently framed these entities as enemies that threaten the “American way of life.”

Reaction and Backlash

Within hours of the posts gaining traction, the article reports a mix of reactions. On Twitter, many conservative users retweeted the ring’s messages, citing them as “true.” However, liberal accounts, as well as some moderate Republicans, criticized the ring for “over‑the‑top rhetoric” and accused it of spreading misinformation. The NBC piece quotes a political analyst from the University of Texas who notes that “the holiday timing was a strategic move, aiming to soften the aggressiveness of the messages while reaching a wider audience.”

The article also cites a response from X’s policy team, which stated that the posts were “non‑compliant with community standards” because they contained “unverified claims about political figures.” X’s team had already flagged several earlier posts by the ring, which led to temporary suspensions of some accounts. These policy actions were noted as a potential deterrent for future ring activity.

Historical Context and Legal Concerns

In exploring the ring’s larger strategy, the NBC article links to an earlier piece on The Washington Post that examined how Trump’s former supporters use “micro‑messaging” to influence public opinion. The link explains that the Post’s analysis traced a pattern of coordinated messaging campaigns dating back to the 2016 election, in which Trump’s allies posted repeated slogans across multiple platforms to amplify the reach of his messaging.

The article also references the U.S. Department of Justice’s 2023 investigation into the alleged “Trump Ringer” group, which claims that the ring has engaged in coordinated defamation campaigns. The DOJ’s investigation is still pending, but it underscores the legal risks associated with the ring’s activities. The NBC piece quotes a DOJ spokesperson who clarified that “while the investigation focuses on defamation, any violation of existing defamation laws could lead to civil or criminal penalties.”

Looking Ahead

With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, the NBC article speculates on the ring’s future. Political commentators quoted in the piece predict that the ring will continue to use social media to rally the base. They suggest that the ring’s focus may shift to other election years, where they’ll be more aggressive and strategic in timing.

In the final section, the article calls for a broader conversation about the role of “rings” in contemporary politics. It emphasizes that while the ring’s messaging is legally protected under the First Amendment, the potential for misinformation, polarization, and influence on vulnerable audiences remains a concern. The article ends with a note that the NBC News team will continue to monitor the ring’s activity and report on any developments, particularly as they relate to Trump’s potential candidacy in 2024.

Key Takeaways (in bullet form)

• The “Trump ring” used Christmas Day to launch a synchronized social‑media campaign aimed at attacking perceived political enemies.
• The campaign combined holiday imagery with partisan rhetoric, targeting Biden, the Democratic Party, the mainstream media, progressive movements, and tech platforms.
• The ring’s posts were coordinated via a dedicated website, allowing rapid, simultaneous dissemination across X, Instagram, and other channels.
• The strategy sparked both support and backlash, with policy teams at social‑media platforms flagging or suspending posts for potential defamation.
• The activity has drawn attention from political analysts and the Department of Justice, highlighting the broader implications of coordinated political messaging in the digital age.

In sum, NBC’s feature sheds light on the mechanics and motivations behind the Trump ring’s holiday‑day messaging blitz, reminding readers that even during the most tranquil of holidays, political actors are actively shaping narratives and mobilizing supporters.