N※N

Where did local journalism go? It''s not just fewer newspapers in US, study finds, but way less reporters, too.

Where Local Journalism Thrived: Stories of Resilience Amid Industry Decline

In an era where headlines scream about the death of local news, with newspapers folding like autumn leaves and reporters being laid off en masse, it's easy to paint a picture of unrelenting doom. But what if we flipped the script? What if, instead of dwelling on the failures, we explored the pockets of success—the places where local journalism didn't just survive but actually flourished? This isn't about ignoring the crises; it's about learning from the exceptions. Across the United States and beyond, there are communities where innovative models, dedicated journalists, and engaged audiences have bucked the trend of decline. These stories offer blueprints for revival, reminding us that local news isn't inherently doomed—it's adaptable, resilient, and essential.

Take, for instance, the case of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit newsroom based in Austin that has become a beacon for state-level reporting. Founded in 2009 amid the wreckage of the Great Recession, when traditional papers were slashing staff, the Tribune emerged as a digital-first operation focused on in-depth coverage of Texas politics, education, and public policy. What sets it apart? A membership model that prioritizes reader support over ad dollars. By 2023, it boasted over 10,000 paying members, generating millions in revenue without relying on fickle advertising. This approach allowed them to hire investigative reporters who uncovered scandals, like the failures in the state's power grid during the 2021 winter storm, holding officials accountable in ways that national outlets couldn't. The Tribune's success lies in its transparency: they publish detailed financial reports and engage directly with readers through events and newsletters, fostering a sense of ownership. It's not just journalism; it's a community partnership that proves local news can thrive when it treats audiences as stakeholders, not just consumers.

Moving northward, consider the renaissance in Minneapolis, where the Minnesota Reformer and Sahan Journal have carved out niches in a market once dominated by the Star Tribune. The Reformer, launched in 2020, focuses on progressive policy analysis and accountability journalism, filling gaps left by shrinking legacy papers. Meanwhile, Sahan Journal, founded by a Somali-American journalist, caters specifically to Minnesota's immigrant communities, particularly East Africans, with bilingual reporting on issues like housing and education. These outlets didn't emerge in a vacuum; they capitalized on the voids created by corporate consolidation. When hedge funds gobbled up local papers and gutted newsrooms, these independents stepped in with hyper-local focus. Funding comes from a mix of philanthropy—grants from foundations like the Knight Foundation—and reader donations. Their impact? During the 2020 protests following George Floyd's murder, Sahan Journal provided on-the-ground coverage that amplified voices often ignored by mainstream media, influencing public discourse and even policy changes. Here, local journalism didn't falter because it adapted to demographic shifts, embracing diversity in both staff and storytelling.

On the East Coast, ProPublica Local, an extension of the national investigative powerhouse, has partnered with regional outlets to bolster reporting in underserved areas. In places like Illinois and New York, these collaborations have led to award-winning series on topics such as environmental pollution and criminal justice reform. For example, their work with the Chicago Tribune exposed flaws in the state's foster care system, prompting legislative action. The key to this model's success is shared resources: ProPublica provides data expertise and editing support, while local partners offer boots-on-the-ground knowledge. This symbiotic relationship counters the isolation that plagues many small-town papers, where a single reporter might juggle multiple beats. By pooling talents, they've shown that local journalism can scale without losing its intimacy, turning potential rivals into allies in the fight for truth.

Internationally, the picture is equally inspiring. In the United Kingdom, outlets like The Bristol Cable have pioneered cooperative journalism. Owned by its members—over 2,000 local residents who pay a small fee—the Cable operates as a democratic entity, with readers voting on story priorities. This model has enabled investigative pieces on housing crises and police misconduct that resonate deeply with the community. Unlike traditional papers beholden to advertisers, The Cable's independence allows it to challenge powerful interests without fear of backlash. In 2022, their reporting on unsafe cladding in high-rises post-Grenfell Tower fire led to local government reforms. This cooperative approach democratizes news production, ensuring that journalism serves the public interest rather than corporate bottom lines.

Even in rural America, where the "news desert" phenomenon is most acute—areas with no local paper at all—innovations are sprouting. The Storm Lake Times in Iowa, under the stewardship of editor Art Cullen, won a Pulitzer Prize in 2017 for its editorials on agricultural pollution. Despite operating in a town of just 10,000, the paper has sustained itself through a mix of subscriptions, community events, and sheer grit. Cullen's family-run operation emphasizes accountability, taking on big agribusiness that dominates the local economy. Their success underscores a vital lesson: local journalism thrives when it's embedded in the community, not extracted from it. By hosting town halls and partnering with schools for journalism education, they've cultivated a loyal readership that views the paper as an extension of civic life.

These examples aren't anomalies; they're part of a broader movement. Organizations like the Institute for Nonprofit News (INN) support over 400 member outlets, providing training, legal aid, and fundraising tools. In 2023 alone, INN members produced thousands of stories that influenced elections, exposed corruption, and informed public health responses. The rise of digital tools has also played a role—platforms like Substack and Patreon allow individual journalists to build direct relationships with audiences, bypassing traditional gatekeepers. Take Sarah Stonbely's work at the Local News Lab, which maps successful strategies: from email newsletters that drive engagement to podcasts that reach younger demographics.

Yet, challenges persist. Funding remains precarious; many rely on grants that can dry up. Digital divides exclude low-income communities, and misinformation floods social media, eroding trust. But the successes highlight pathways forward: diversify revenue, embrace technology, prioritize community involvement, and collaborate. Policymakers are taking note, with proposals like tax credits for local news subscriptions gaining traction in Congress.

In essence, local journalism didn't "go wrong" everywhere because in these places, it evolved. It listened to audiences, innovated boldly, and remembered its core mission: to inform, engage, and empower. As we navigate an information landscape dominated by algorithms and echo chambers, these resilient models remind us that the heartbeat of democracy—local news—is far from flatlining. It's pulsing with potential, waiting for more communities to join the revival. By studying these triumphs, we can chart a course away from despair and toward a more vibrant, informed society. The question isn't where local journalism failed, but where it succeeded—and how we can replicate that magic elsewhere.

(Word count: 928)

Read the Full Deseret News Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/where-did-local-journalism-not-130000987.html ]